Mies van der Rohe is a master of
the modern architecture. He likes simple, plain and makes everything minimal
just like what he says “Less is more”.
Most of his building is as simple as a glass box and this is what makes
him became famous. In his architectural work, he always uses an honest
material, which means that you can see every single detail in his
architecture. He normally put in every
piece of construction material together without any painted or covered on. The
purpose of doing this is because he wants his building to be as a book, which
people can come and learned from it. Mies’s building looked so stunning by
itself, so there is no need for any ornament involved. The more decoration will
take people’s attention away, which lead to the failure of the architecture.
Beside this people will only care about the ornament and forget about the
function of the building.
However, Mies seems not
interested in any house decoration. But, in fact, he also uses it unclearly.
The decoration is carefully camouflaged along with the building, so that the
building still looks modern. In this case, I feel like Mies just had broken his
own rule because the main thing about being a modernist is to make everything
functional and turn back against every kind of the ornament. But maybe this is
an exception for those rules, which the main purpose of the rule
anti-decoration is that it will take the attention away. For Mies, his
decoration is become one part of the architecture and it’s enhance the
aesthetic of the building itself.
In the conclusion, the ornament
is acceptable as long as it not takes attention away from the building.
Otherwise the design of the building will not significant any more.
No comments:
Post a Comment